Minimal Obstructions for Partial Representations of Interval Graphs

Interval graphs are intersection graphs of closed intervals. A generalization of recognition called partial representation extension was introduced recently. The input gives an interval graph with a partial representation specifying some pre-drawn intervals. We ask whether the remaining intervals can be added to create an extending representation. Two linear-time algorithms are known for solving this problem. In this paper, we characterize the minimal obstructions which make partial representations non-extendible. This generalizes Lekkerkerker and Boland's characterization of the minimal forbidden induced subgraphs of interval graphs. Each minimal obstruction consists of a forbidden induced subgraph together with at most four pre-drawn intervals. A Helly-type result follows: A partial representation is extendible if and only if every quadruple of pre-drawn intervals is extendible by itself. Our characterization leads to a linear-time certifying algorithm for partial representation extension

Bounded Representations of Interval and Proper Interval Graphs

Klavik et al. [arXiv:1207.6960] recently introduced a generalization of recognition called the bounded representation problem which we study for the classes of interval and proper interval graphs. The input gives a graph G and in addition for each vertex v two intervals L_v and R_v called bounds. We ask whether there exists a bounded representation in which each interval I_v has its left endpoint in L_v and its right endpoint in R_v. We show that the problem can be solved in linear time for interval graphs and in quadratic time for proper interval graphs. Robert's Theorem states that the classes of proper interval graphs and unit interval graphs are equal. Surprisingly the bounded representation problem is polynomially solvable for proper interval graphs and NP-complete for unit interval graphs [Klav\'{\i}k et al., arxiv:1207.6960]. So unless P = NP, the proper and unit interval representations behave very differently. The bounded representation problem belongs to a wider class of restricted representation problems. These problems are generalizations of the well-understood recognition problem, and they ask whether there exists a representation of G satisfying some additional constraints. The bounded representation problems generalize many of these problems

Extending Upward Planar Graph Drawings

In this paper we study the computational complexity of the Upward Planarity Extension problem, which takes in input an upward planar drawing $\Gamma_H$ of a subgraph $H$ of a directed graph $G$ and asks whether $\Gamma_H$ can be extended to an upward planar drawing of $G$. Our study fits into the line of research on the extensibility of partial representations, which has recently become a mainstream in Graph Drawing. We show the following results. First, we prove that the Upward Planarity Extension problem is NP-complete, even if $G$ has a prescribed upward embedding, the vertex set of $H$ coincides with the one of $G$, and $H$ contains no edge. Second, we show that the Upward Planarity Extension problem can be solved in $O(n \log n)$ time if $G$ is an $n$-vertex upward planar $st$-graph. This result improves upon a known $O(n^2)$-time algorithm, which however applies to all $n$-vertex single-source upward planar graphs. Finally, we show how to solve in polynomial time a surprisingly difficult version of the Upward Planarity Extension problem, in which $G$ is a directed path or cycle with a prescribed upward embedding, $H$ contains no edges, and no two vertices share the same $y$-coordinate in $\Gamma_H$

Contact Representations of Planar Graphs - Extending a Partial Representation is Hard

International audienc

Extending Partial Representations of Circle Graphs

The partial representation extension problem is a recently introduced generalization of the recognition problem. A circle graph is an intersection graph of chords of a circle. We study the partial representation extension problem for circle graphs, where the input consists of a graph G and a partial representation R′ giving some pre-drawn chords that represent an induced subgraph of G. The question is whether one can extend R′ to a representation R of the entire G, i.e., whether one can draw the remaining chords into a partially pre-drawn representation. Our main result is a polynomial-time algorithm for partial representation extension of circle graphs. To show this, we describe the structure of all representation a circle graph based on split decomposition. This can be of an independent interest

Inserting One Edge into a Simple Drawing Is Hard

A simple drawing D(G) of a graph G is one where each pair of edges share at most one point: either a common endpoint or a proper crossing. An edge e in the complement of G can be inserted into D(G) if there exists a simple drawing of G+e extending D(G). As a result of Levi’s Enlargement Lemma, if a drawing is rectilinear (pseudolinear), that is, the edges can be extended into an arrangement of lines (pseudolines), then any edge in the complement of G can be inserted. In contrast, we show that it is NP -complete to decide whether one edge can be inserted into a simple drawing. This remains true even if we assume that the drawing is pseudocircular, that is, the edges can be extended to an arrangement of pseudocircles. On the positive side, we show that, given an arrangement of pseudocircles A and a pseudosegment σ , it can be decided in polynomial time whether there exists a pseudocircle Φσ extending σ for which A∪{Φσ} is again an arrangement of pseudocircles

LNCS

A simple drawing D(G) of a graph G is one where each pair of edges share at most one point: either a common endpoint or a proper crossing. An edge e in the complement of G can be inserted into D(G) if there exists a simple drawing of G+e extending D(G). As a result of Levi’s Enlargement Lemma, if a drawing is rectilinear (pseudolinear), that is, the edges can be extended into an arrangement of lines (pseudolines), then any edge in the complement of G can be inserted. In contrast, we show that it is NP -complete to decide whether one edge can be inserted into a simple drawing. This remains true even if we assume that the drawing is pseudocircular, that is, the edges can be extended to an arrangement of pseudocircles. On the positive side, we show that, given an arrangement of pseudocircles A and a pseudosegment σ , it can be decided in polynomial time whether there exists a pseudocircle Φσ extending σ for which A∪{Φσ} is again an arrangement of pseudocircles